Thursday, 8 May 2025
Wednesday, 7 May 2025
The Feral Historian's analysis of Mad Max emphasizes how society doesn’t fall all at once—it decays while people keep going to work, following rules, and pretending the world still functions. That's the essence of the eerie realism in Mad Max (1979): Max is still a cop, courts still operate, coffee shops are open—even as everything is clearly coming apart.
Let’s now re-compare the Angels in the Asylum story to that stage of Mad Max society, as Feral Historian outlines:
🎥 Angels in the Asylum = The Pre-Apocalypse
👮 Simon Pegg = Mad Max as the Still-Loyal Officer
Like Max in the original film, Pegg is a respected figure trying to do his job in a crumbling system. He signs on in good faith, lends his reputation to the project, shows up to work. But the system is already broken—it just hasn’t admitted it yet.
🏢 The Film Industry = The Thin Veneer of Civilization
Much like the Mad Max world where police stations still function despite lawlessness outside, the film industry still puts up posters, announces press releases, and casts stars, even while financing disappears, contracts are violated, and staff go unpaid. It all looks normal—until it isn’t.
👥 The Crew = The Everyday Citizens
150 crew members, like ordinary Australians in Mad Max, still believe the rules apply: If you work, you get paid. If you report a violation, someone will fix it. But the machinery behind those rules has hollowed out. They're enacting a script from a vanished world.
💰 The Missing Money = The Fuel Crisis
In Mad Max, it’s oil and gas being rationed. Here, it’s capital. Everyone’s still talking like the project has fuel, but behind the scenes the tank is empty. The funding fell through, but they kept shooting anyway—pretending the pump still works.
🤡 The Producers = Bureaucrats in Denial
Like the police chief in Mad Max, who wants to hold the line and “show strength,” the producers issue apologies, downplay the severity, and promise fixes—even while the entire system is breaking beneath them. They’re not lying maliciously. They just refuse to believe the old world is dead.
🧠 Feral Historian’s Lens:
This is not sudden collapse—it’s rot behind routine. People clock in, answer emails, and set up cameras on set, even as the foundations are gone. Just like in Mad Max, the rituals of society continue because people need them to. The alternative is facing the truth: The old world isn’t coming back.
🕰️ The Hunger Clock – May 2025
Scenario Probability Model: Western Food Security under Scholz Crisis Conditions
⚠️ Important Note:
This Hunger Clock is a probabilistic model, not a deterministic prophecy. These outcomes reflect observed trends and historical analogues, but not certainty. Unexpected variables — political decisions, climate events, or mass mobilizations — can radically change trajectories. Like the Doomsday Clock, this is a warning tool, not a prediction.
🎲 Ten Plausible Outcomes (2025–2026)
Each includes its probability, description, and historical resonance.
1. Mild Inflation, Managed Scarcity – 22%
Western countries continue to experience food price inflation, but rationing and public subsidies hold the line. Minor hunger pockets form, mostly in marginalized urban or rural areas.
Closest historical match: U.S. during the 1970s oil crisis or post-war UK rationing.
🟡 Outcome severity: Low–Moderate
2. Severe Inflation, Food Deserts Expand – 18%
Prices of key staples double or triple. Urban food deserts and bankrupt groceries increase. Government assistance weakens. Food banks overwhelmed.
Historical echo: Argentina’s 2001 collapse or Venezuela mid-2010s.
🟠 Outcome severity: Moderate–High
3. Regional Rationing or State Food Programs Reintroduced – 12%
Some Western countries revive wartime-style rationing or state-run grocery stores. This stabilizes supply but indicates serious systemic stress.
Historical model: WWII rationing, Cuban “libreta” system.
🟡 Outcome severity: Moderate
4. Supply Chain Collapse Triggers Panic Buying – 10%
A series of cyberattacks, port disruptions, or fuel crises collapses logistics. Supermarket shelves empty. Not full starvation — but chaos.
Parallel: COVID-19 early panic, but lasting longer.
🔴 Outcome severity: High (short-term shock)
5. Starvation in Marginalized Zones – 8%
Western countries begin seeing deaths from hunger among the homeless, migrants, and underfunded Indigenous or remote communities.
Echo: 1930s U.S. Dust Bowl, First Nations food insecurity today.
🔴 Outcome severity: High (localized)
6. Civil Unrest Over Food – 6%
Hunger leads to riots, grocery looting, or food distribution centers being stormed. Militarized responses worsen tensions.
Historical echo: 2008 global food riots, Arab Spring triggers.
🔴 Outcome severity: High (social chaos)
7. Farmers Protest or Rebel – 5%
Collapse in subsidies or price controls causes farmers to strike or destroy crops. Food becomes available but not distributed.
Historical model: French farmer protests, India’s 2021 farmer strike.
🟠 Outcome severity: Medium
8. Mass Gardening & DIY Food Movement – 5%
Urban populations turn to community gardens, aquaponics, and DIY food as supermarket trust collapses. Still hardship, but innovative response.
Analogues: Cuba’s urban gardens after Soviet collapse.
🟢 Outcome severity: Low–Moderate (positive adaptation)
9. Import Ban or Global Food Nationalism – 5%
Major exporters (Brazil, India, Russia) halt food shipments to protect domestic supply. Western countries scramble.
Historical echo: 2022 India wheat ban.
🔴 Outcome severity: High (global scramble)
10. Strategic Global Grain Reserves Released – 4%
UN, U.S., or China release massive food reserves to prevent famine. A late save — but a save.
Parallel: U.S. grain diplomacy in the Cold War.
🟢 Outcome severity: Low–Moderate (delayed rescue)
🌀 5% Reserved for “Other/Unknown”
Scenarios beyond forecasting:
-
Biotech breakthrough solves logistics
-
Mass migration of farmers to cities
-
Rogue actor poisons food supply
-
Alien corn falls from the sky
👽
🪫 Outcome severity: ???
A starvation crisis in the West — meaning chronic food insecurity among large swaths of the population, not just isolated poverty — would likely be a late-Phase 2 or early-Phase 3 development in the Scholz Crisis 2025 timeline. Here's the likely arc, step-by-step: