PeePee Will Get on your Shoes Everytime, And Your Like It

STEP 2: Psychological Profile of Pierre Poilievre and his Indirect Utility to Foreign Actors

2A. Personality and Political Style

To understand how foreign actors might strategically utilize Pierre Poilievre's profile, we need to dissect both his public persona and psychological traits.

Traits Based on Rhetoric and Behavior:

• High Dominance (Authoritarian Tendencies): Poilievre often uses strong, combative language to position himself as a leader who stands against the "elite," which appeals to those frustrated with the status quo. This positions him well to be leveraged by foreign actors who benefit from weakening liberal, technocratic institutions.

• Anti-Establishment: He frequently targets institutions (like the Bank of Canada or the CBC), echoing populist themes that delegitimize mainstream authority figures and institutions. This parallels tactics used by Russia and China to erode trust in liberal democratic systems.

• Focus on Economic Nationalism: Poilievre's advocacy for economic sovereignty and less regulation resonates with foreign interests like Russia’s need for less Western oversight, and China’s desire for fewer restrictions on its economic expansion.

2B. Ego Protection and Plausible Deniability

• Deliberate Denial of Influence: Poilievre has maintained a plausible deniability approach regarding any foreign influence—he consistently portrays himself as independent of any foreign ties, a characteristic that would be attractive to foreign powers aiming to maintain indirect influence while avoiding detection.

• Appeal to the Populist Narrative: His anti-globalist rhetoric—positioning himself as the defender of Canadian sovereignty against foreign elites—aligns well with the strategic interests of foreign powers wishing to create division between Canada and its allies.

2C. How Foreign Powers Would Exploit His Personality

• Psychological Leverage: Poilievre’s psychological profile—anti-elite, combative, and populist—would make him an ideal candidate to be manipulated via narrative control. These traits make him a figure who believes himself to be above external manipulation, thus making him a useful instrument for indirect influence.

• Vulnerability to Disinformation: Individuals with strong political convictions against “elitism” or “globalism” are often more susceptible to narratives that feed into their worldview—making him a potential conduit for foreign propaganda, even without direct involvement.

---

STEP 3: Foreign Disinformation Playbook as It Appears in Canada

Now that we have Poilievre’s psychological traits mapped, let’s explore how Russia and China might deploy their disinformation strategies to exert influence indirectly, using Poilievre as a possible unwitting amplifier of their agendas.

3A. Russian Disinformation Playbook

• Information Warfare (Hybrid Tactics): Russia has a long history of using disinformation to divide Western societies, particularly through online manipulation and media channels. This includes:

  • Pushing divisive rhetoric: Such as anti-establishment narratives, calls for populist rebellion, or victimizing nationalistic rhetoric.

  • Targeting key figures: Disinformation might involve amplifying the most polarizing narratives—for instance, Carney’s globalism or Trudeau’s ties to international organizations—which may play into Poilievre’s narrative of "elites."

  • Exploiting Political Divides: By focusing on wedge issues like immigration or national identity, Russia could intentionally stoke tensions between left and right to prevent unified democratic opposition.

Case Example: Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election highlighted their use of microtargeting through social media. They utilized divisive issues to push populist candidates who could destabilize Western alliances, an approach that could be mirrored in Canada.

3B. Chinese Disinformation Playbook

• United Front Tactics: Through diaspora manipulation, China can subtly influence public opinion, particularly among ethnic Chinese communities, to support candidates who are more amenable to Beijing’s political and economic interests.

  • Economic Pressure and Soft Power: China also leverages its economic clout by using investments or trade relations to subtly push pro-China narratives, both within media and public discourse.

  • Suppressing Opposition to China: Discrediting those who criticize China’s human rights abuses or its geopolitical ambitions (e.g., in Hong Kong, Taiwan, Xinjiang) is key to China’s disinformation operations.

Case Example: WeChat has become a primary channel for Chinese-language disinformation in Canada. The spread of false or misleading narratives can align with pro-populist rhetoric that undermines Carney’s technocratic approach.

3C. Techniques and Methods to Influence Poilievre’s Narrative

1. Botnet Amplification:

   • Social media bots can push right-wing populist messages, amplifying Poilievre’s anti-establishment stances, while masking the origin of the narrative.

   • Using fake accounts, coordinated messaging campaigns could support Poilievre’s rise and sabotage his opponents, especially Carney, by linking him to globalist elites.

2. Narrative Control via Outlets and Influencers:

   • Foreign actors can promote pro-Poilievre narratives through media outlets and influencers who are aligned with anti-globalist or anti-establishment rhetoric.

   • These influencers might inadvertently serve as vectors for foreign-backed narratives, using local issues (e.g., immigration, climate change) to push broader strategic interests.

---

Next Steps to Investigate:

• Step 4: Soft Signals & Anomalies: Identifying digital footprints and any suspicious social media activity connected to these disinformation campaigns.

• Step 5: The Mark Carney Threat Axis: Deep dive into why foreign actors focus on smearing Carney specifically and its geopolitical rationale.